{"id":29025,"date":"2021-02-02T13:40:32","date_gmt":"2021-02-02T19:40:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/?p=29025"},"modified":"2021-02-02T13:40:32","modified_gmt":"2021-02-02T19:40:32","slug":"helmet-law-repeal-considered","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/?p=29025","title":{"rendered":"Helmet law repeal considered"},"content":{"rendered":"

Members of the Transportation and Telecommunications Committee heard testimony Feb. 2 on a proposal to repeal the state\u2019s motorcycle helmet requirement.<\/p>\n

\"Sen.
Sen. Ben Hansen<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Current state law requires all motorcycle or moped riders to wear a protective helmet. LB581, introduced by Blair Sen. Ben Hansen, instead would give riders 21 and older the option to wear no helmet, but would require completion of a certified motorcycle safety course and eye protection while riding.<\/p>\n

One of the most important things Nebraskans can gain from the bill, Hansen said, is the restoration of freedom that the government has removed from motorcyclists.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis issue is more than a medical or economic issue,\u201d he said. \u201cThere are more than 55,000 proud motorcyclists residing in Nebraska that have a rich culture and history that just want the option to choose whether or not to wear a helmet.\u201d<\/p>\n

Supporting the bill was Todd Miller, chairperson of ABATE of Nebraska. In written testimony he said that repealing the helmet law would increase tourism spending in the state, including up to $4 million in revenue from people traveling to and from the annual Sturgis Motorcycle Rally in South Dakota.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn these economic hard times, shouldn\u2019t we consider passing favorable legislation to welcome those from states without mandatory helmet laws into our state to explore our scenic highways and small towns?\u201d Miller said.<\/p>\n

Former state senator Dave Bloomfield, who offered similar proposals during his time in the Legislature, spoke in support of LB581. Freedom is a precious commodity, he said, which is nearly impossible to regain once it\u2019s lost.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe people who have lost this right are not a bunch of radicals,\u201d Bloomfield said. \u201cThey are decent, hardworking, freedom-loving Americans who have been fighting within the system for over a quarter of a century, trying to regain a right that was taken from them.\u201d<\/p>\n

Brooke Murtaugh, brain injury program manager at Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital, opposed the bill. No one can understand the pain and suffering of traumatic brain injury survivors, she said, including the long-term cognitive, mental, emotional and physical deficits experienced by many.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnything we can do as Nebraskans to lessen the incidence and severity of traumatic brain injuries is critically important,\u201d Murtaugh said.<\/p>\n

Also opposing the measure was Alicia Gentle, representing the Nebraska Emergency Nurses Association. She said that requiring motorcycle operators under 21 to wear a helmet would protect less than 1 percent of all licensed operators in Nebraska.<\/p>\n

\u201cI have seen firsthand the impact wearing helmets has on motorcycle riders in our state,\u201d Gentle said. \u201cHelmets decrease the severity of head injuries, the likelihood of death and the cost of medical care.\u201d<\/p>\n

The committee took no immediate action on LB581.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Members of the Transportation and Telecommunications Committee heard testimony Feb. 2 on a proposal to repeal the state\u2019s motorcycle helmet requirement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22],"tags":[252],"class_list":["post-29025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-transportation-and-telecommunications","tag-sen-ben-hansen"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=29025"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29025\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29026,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29025\/revisions\/29026"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=29025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=29025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=29025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}