{"id":25950,"date":"2019-04-17T14:02:39","date_gmt":"2019-04-17T20:02:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/?p=25950"},"modified":"2019-04-17T14:02:39","modified_gmt":"2019-04-17T20:02:39","slug":"bill-to-require-voter-approval-for-wireless-taxes-stalls","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/?p=25950","title":{"rendered":"Bill to require voter approval for wireless taxes stalls"},"content":{"rendered":"

After debate spanning two days, a bill that would require municipalities to seek voter approval before levying additional taxes on wireless services stalled on general file April 17.<\/p>\n

\"Sen.
Sen. Tony Vargas<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

LB550, as introduced by Omaha Sen. Tony Vargas, would require a municipality to secure voter approval before imposing any local tax or fee on wireless services. Vargas said other Midwestern states provide the same services at a much lower cost to consumers.<\/p>\n

\u201c[The bill] provides greater transparency for voters who will better understand how much of those taxes they\u2019re paying for, what the money funds and [would allow] each person to consider whether or not they support it,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

The bill would have made additional changes to taxes and fees imposed on wireless services, including:
\n\u2022 lowering the enhanced wireless 911 surcharge from 70 cents to 35 cents;
\n\u2022 eliminating the prepaid wireless surcharge; and
\n\u2022 exempting wireless service from a surcharge used to fund the state\u2019s telecommunications relay system.<\/p>\n

Vargas introduced an amendment that would have replaced the bill and simply required municipalities to seek voter approval for any occupation tax on wireless services, including existing taxes. Any existing occupation tax would be suspended until approved by voters.<\/p>\n

Vargas withdrew the amendment so that senators could consider an alternative approach.<\/p>\n

Omaha Sen. Justin Wayne then introduced an amendment that would replace the bill. If adopted, it would require a municipality to seek voter approval only on new occupation taxes or increases in existing occupation taxes on wireless and prepaid wireless services.<\/p>\n

Whether it is property, sales or occupation taxes, Wayne said, Nebraskans should have more of a say in the matter.<\/p>\n

\u201cAt the end of the day, we have some of the highest taxes around,\u201d he said. \u201cFor a simple majority vote at the local [government] level to increase taxes, I think is not proper.\u201d<\/p>\n

Opposing the bill was Sen. Matt Williams of Gothenburg. Allowing municipalities to levy taxes on wireless services helps level the funding playing field, he said.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt seems much [fairer] to those community leaders to have a small occupation tax on cell phones because those community [members] who have moved there almost all carry cell phones,\u201d Williams said. \u201cThose people use the streets that the city pays for, they use the water, the sewer system and they certainly use the police protection that is offered. This is a way to have them contributing to that cost.\u201d<\/p>\n

Lincoln Sen. Adam Morfeld also opposed LB550. Lincoln would lose $4 million of its $178 million budget if the bill becomes law, he said, and that money most likely would be replaced with property tax revenue.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe elect city councilors and elected representatives to represent our interests, make decisions, have public hearings and come to conclusions,\u201d Morfeld said. \u201cIf we start having public votes on this occupation tax, why not have public votes on every single tax?\u201d<\/p>\n

The Legislature moved on to the next item on the agenda before voting on LB550 or any of the pending amendments. Per a practice implemented by Speaker Jim Scheer, the sponsor of a bill that is facing a potential filibuster must demonstrate sufficient support for a cloture motion before the measure will be scheduled for additional debate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

After debate spanning two days, a bill that would require municipalities to seek voter approval before levying additional taxes on wireless services stalled on general file April 17.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":25937,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22],"tags":[184],"class_list":["post-25950","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-transportation-and-telecommunications","tag-sen-tony-vargas"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/LB550Vargas4-16-19a.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25950","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25950"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25950\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25951,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25950\/revisions\/25951"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/25937"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25950"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25950"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25950"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}