{"id":23656,"date":"2018-03-20T16:50:48","date_gmt":"2018-03-20T22:50:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/?p=23656"},"modified":"2018-03-20T16:50:48","modified_gmt":"2018-03-20T22:50:48","slug":"ops-omnibus-retirement-bill-advanced","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/?p=23656","title":{"rendered":"OPS, omnibus retirement bill advanced"},"content":{"rendered":"

A bill that makes numerous changes to the state\u2019s retirement plans advanced to select file March 20.<\/p>\n

\"Sen.
Sen. Mark Kolterman<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

LB1005, introduced by Seward Sen. Mark Kolterman, would address the withdrawal of a county or school entity from the state\u2019s retirement plans. Kolterman said the bill would ensure that the county or school retirement systems are not financially liable for any of the costs of an entity’s business transactions that result in withdrawal from the systems.<\/p>\n

Kolterman said the bill was triggered by Saunders Medical Center\u2019s interest in the possibility of discontinuing participation in the county retirement plan and by the trend of school districts privatizing parts of their organizations\u2014such as bus drivers and food and janitorial service\u2014which results in the termination of the employees in the school employees\u2019 retirement plan.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe actuary has advised that these withdrawals and terminations of membership would likely result in funding impacts on the plan,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

LB1005 would authorize the Public Employees Retirement Board (PERB) and the Nebraska Public Employees Retirement System (NPERS) to act if an employer in the county or school plan makes a business decision to withdraw from the plan in whole or in part. The PERB and NPERS would be granted authority that:
\n\u2022 allows the PERB to determine employer and employee eligibility to participate in the retirement systems;
\n\u2022 allows employers to request an actuarial study that calculates what the employer needs to pay to fund the retirement benefits for plan members affected by the employer’s business transactions;
\n\u2022 provides direction on how the actuarial study calculates the employer’s liability to fund the retirement benefits for affected plan members; and
\n\u2022 outlines how the employer would pay for the actuarial study and the amount necessary to fund the retirement benefits for affected plan members.<\/p>\n

Under the bill, affected employees who are terminated from the retirement plan would be considered fully vested and considered inactive within 90 days of the entity’s withdrawal or determination of ineligibility. On or after Jan. 1, 2019, no county hospital facility established could elect or discontinue participation in the retirement system.<\/p>\n

A Nebraska Retirement Systems Committee amendment, adopted 35-0, added provisions of an amendment to LB548, which was introduced last session by Omaha Sen. Brett Lindstrom. Originally the bill would have consolidated the Class V (Omaha) School Employees Retirement System (OSERS) with the School Employees Retirement Plan.<\/p>\n

Kolterman filed an amendment this session to replace LB548 and change definitions in the Class V School Employees Retirement Act to reflect new actuarial assumptions regarding mortality tables and interest rates.<\/p>\n

The amendment also inserts a new definition of solvency as the actuarially required contribution (ARC) amount as annotated in each annual valuation report. It requires the school district to deposit the annual ARC into the retirement fund by Aug. 31.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe majority of the provisions in the committee amendment are related to ensuring the plans administered by the state and the plan administered by OSERS remain sustainable, that funding payments reflect the amount determined by the actuary and that the employer who chooses to withdraw\u2014in whole or in part\u2014will bear any funding obligations so other plan members, employers or the state do not become liable for any funding requirements,\u201d Kolterman said.<\/p>\n

The committee amendment also added to LB1005 provisions of three bills introduced by Kolterman:
\nLB698, which would make permissive the promulgation of rules and regulations by plans administered by PERB;
\nLB699, which would harmonize language in the state plans that inadvertently was left out of a bill passed last session; and
\nLB700, which would remove the obligation of the state investment officer and the Nebraska Investment Council to invest the funds in the University Trust Fund. The fund is overseen and managed by the University of Nebraska and does not contain tax dollars.<\/p>\n

Following adoption of the committee amendment, lawmakers voted 38-1 to advance the bill to select file.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A bill that makes numerous changes to the state\u2019s retirement plans advanced to select file March 20.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":23654,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[16],"tags":[143],"class_list":["post-23656","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-retirement-systems","tag-sen-mark-kolterman"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/LB1005Kolterman3-20-18a.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23656","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23656"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23656\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23658,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23656\/revisions\/23658"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/23654"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23656"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23656"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23656"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}