{"id":18196,"date":"2016-01-27T16:22:18","date_gmt":"2016-01-27T22:22:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/?p=18196"},"modified":"2016-01-27T16:22:18","modified_gmt":"2016-01-27T22:22:18","slug":"removal-of-marriage-in-constitution-proposed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/?p=18196","title":{"rendered":"Removal of marriage in constitution proposed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Members of the Judiciary Committee heard testimony Jan. 27 on a proposed amendment to the state constitution that would remove a provision regarding marriage in response to a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling.<\/p>\n<p>LR389CA, introduced by Omaha Sen. Burke Harr, would remove a provision of the state constitution that defines marriage as the legal union of a man and a woman and does not recognize the union of a same-sex couple.<\/p>\n<p>If passed by the Legislature, the proposed amendment would be placed on the November 2016 ballot.<\/p>\n<p>Because the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that marriage is a fundmental right for same-sex couples, Harr said, the Nebraska provision is moot and unenforceable.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe have a state constitution that\u2019s currently in conflict with the U.S. Constitution. [LR389CA] would make our state constitution match the law of the land,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>The committee took no immediate action on the measure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Members of the Judiciary Committee heard testimony Jan. 27 on a proposed amendment to the state constitution that would remove<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[13],"tags":[108],"class_list":["post-18196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-judiciary","tag-sen-burke-harr"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18196"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18196\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18197,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18196\/revisions\/18197"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/update.legislature.ne.gov\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}