Tax credit debated for private school scholarship donations

Lawmakers debated a bill March 23 that would create an income tax credit for those who donate money to nonprofits that grant scholarships to students to attend a private elementary or secondary school.

Under LB295, introduced by Papillion Sen. Jim Smith last session, individuals, pass-through entities, estates, trusts and corporations could receive a nonrefundable income tax credit equal to the contributions they make to scholarship-granting organizations. The scholarships could be used to pay for tuition and fees for attending a nongovernmental, privately operated elementary or secondary school in Nebraska.

Sen. Jim Smith
Sen. Jim Smith

Smith said the credits would give more middle- and low-income families the ability to send their children to private school if they decide that a public school is not a good fit. The bill would not divert money away from the state’s public schools, he said.

“LB295 enables more parents to do what they think is best for their children,” Smith said, “not just those who are fortunate to have the money to do so.”

A pending Revenue Committee amendment would cap the total amount of credits available in 2019 at $2 million instead of the original bill’s $10 million. The amendment would allow an annual 20 percent increase in subsequent years if most of the credits are claimed, but it would limit the amount of credits available per year to $10 million.

Only students who are Nebraska residents and whose household income does not exceed twice the eligible income for the federal reduced-price lunch program could qualify for the scholarships. They also must be receiving an education scholarship for the first time and transferring from a public school or entering kindergarten or the ninth grade.

Nonprofits could apply to the state Department of Revenue to become certified scholarship-granting organizations. They would be required to allocate at least 90 percent of their revenue for education scholarships and no more than 10 percent for administrative costs.

Individuals could receive credits equal to their contributions to scholarship-granting organizations up to $10,000 per year for those married filing jointly and $5,000 if filing as an individual.

A partnership, limited liability company, subchapter S corporation, estate or trust could receive up to $50,000 per year in credits for its contributions.

A corporation would be eligible for up to $150,000 in credits per year. The total amount of credits allowed for corporations would be capped at 70 percent of the annual limit.

Smith said he would introduce an amendment to the committee amendment that would cap the credit at 75 percent of the total contributions made during the tax year, instead of the originally proposed dollar-for-dollar credit.

Sen. Lou Ann Linehan of Elkhorn supported the bill, saying that it would give low-income parents the opportunity to send their children to a school that best fits their needs. Linehan said the scholarships could be used only at private schools accredited by the state and that private school students take nationally recognized standardized tests in elementary, junior high and high school.

She also cited research showing that similar tax credits in 18 other states have saved those states money by reducing the number of children attending public schools.

“Public schools are critically, critically important,” Linehan said, “but they don’t work for every kid, and we all know that.”

Sen. Burke Harr of Omaha opposed the bill, saying that the scholarships could be used only at private schools that do “not discriminate on the basis of race, color or national origin.” That would allow those schools to discriminate against students based on their sexual orientation, discipline record and physical or learning disabilities, he said.

“If you are not of a legal status, they can reject you,” Harr said. “If you are not of the proper religion, they can reject you—nothing in the bill prevents that.”

Lincoln Sen. Adam Morfeld also opposed the bill. He said he supports both public and private schools, but he does not believe that public funds should be used to pay for tuition at private schools. He said the income eligibility requirements in the bill would not target the credits to low- and middle-income families and that private schools are not subject to the same state testing and accountability measures as public schools.

“We can’t even fund our state-funded schools and our public education system the way it is,” he said. “And yet we’re creating a whole new system for a whole group of schools that quite frankly don’t need it.”

Sen. Kate Bolz of Lincoln said the bill’s potential $10 million impact to the state budget concerns her, especially when state’s school funding formula has been fully funded in only 3 of the last 16 years. She also questioned whether the bill would save the state money.

“The legislative fiscal note says that students leaving public schools would be too widely dispersed to produce cost savings,” she said. “It’s my understanding that that finding is consistent with decades of results from other states, including Wisconsin, which has one of the longest-running voucher programs in the country.”

Harr filed a motion to indefinitely postpone the bill, which would end consideration on it for the session. The motion failed on a 9-19 vote.

The Legislature adjourned for the day before voting on the committee amendment or the bill. Per a practice implemented last year by Speaker Jim Scheer, the sponsor of a bill that is facing a potential filibuster must demonstrate sufficient support for a cloture motion before the measure will be scheduled for additional debate.

Bookmark and Share